🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of states are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful first step," stated one parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a teenager who died after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to follow this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this international discussion evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.